Airtel introduces emergency alert service!!

Bharti Airtel has introduced an 24 X 7 emergency alert service for its customers. The service enables Airtel customers to send an alert with their geographic location to their 10 contacts in an emergency situation.

“During an emergency, Airtel mobile customers can now send an alert with their geographic location to their closest 10 loved ones simultaneously with just a call, facilitating an access to easy and quick help,”Airtel says in a statement.

bharti-airtel-ltd-300x224

bharti-airtel-ltd-300×224 (Photo credit: bhautikjoshi)

Airtel’s Emergency Alert Service is available for Rs. 30 with a validity of 30 days. Users can send the alert even if they don’t have minimum balance in their account. To send the alert via SMS, users need to type HELP in the message box and send it to 55100, which will be then sent to all 10 contacts. To send the alert via call, users need to call at 55100 and the registered contacts will get the voice alerts with location details of the customer.

Airtel hopes its new emergency alert service will see adoption by customers from all segments including, working women, senior citizens, teenagers and migrant workers. Airtel says the service could be really helpful in staying connected with their friends and families in case of natural calamities or disasters such as fire and accidents. According to Airtel, the service will ensure a user can seek help round the clock. You can learn more about the Airtel’s emergency alert service here.

If you are a smartphone user, you have various alternatives for Airtel’s emergency alert service. Last year, non-profit organisation Whypoll launched a ‘Fight Back’ app for women. The app allows users to send SOS message via SMS, e-mail and Facebook at the press of a single key. There is also an Eyewatch app, which sends multiple messages, images, videos, sound bites and other details such as location status with the press of a button.

Read more at!

20 Years Of Texting: The Rise And Fall Of LOL !

It has saved lives and ruined marriages, created a whole new dialect and made billions in profits for phone companies. But as the humble text message celebrates its 20th birthday, some wonder how much longer it will survive in a world of smartphones and all-you-can-eat data.

The number of SMS – short message service – messages being sent has rocketed year after year but there are signs it has peaked in a number of countries, including Spain, the Netherlands, Finland, Hong Kong and Australia. A new generation of users who might once have used texts now use data services such as WhatsApp and BlackBerry Messenger (BBM) for free.

Texting

“There’s a lot of these services out there – I’ve counted 25 which have a total of 2.5bn reported accounts, though many of those will be duplicates,” said Benedict Evans, telecoms analyst at Enders Analysis. “There are probably 10 which have more than 100 million users – and BBM isn’t among them; that’s only got 60 million.”

The first text message was sent on 3 December 1992, when the 22-year-old British engineer Neil Papworth used his computer to wish a “Merry Christmas” to Richard Jarvis, of Vodafone, on his Orbitel 901 mobile phone. Papworth didn’t get a reply because there was no way to send a text from a phone in those days. That had to wait for Nokia’s first mobile phone in 1993.

The first text messages were free and could only be sent between people on the same network, but in 1994 Vodafone – then one of only two mobile networks in the UK – launched a share price alert system. The arrival in 1995 of the Tegic (aka T9) system, which created “predictive” texting based on the letters you had typed, meant texting could take off.

Commercial services soon followed, and though they started life as a free service – because operators hadn’t figured out how to charge for them – it was quickly realised there was money to be made from texting as the number rose dramatically. By February 2001 the UK was sending one billion texts a month, which at the standard 10p-a-text charge meant the business was raking in about £100m a month.

The amount of data in a text message is tiny, at just 128 bytes. Charged at the same price per byte, a 650MB music CD would cost more than £60,000.

In the same year texting became key to people’s lives – literally, for 14 British tourists stranded in the Lombok Strait off Bali who were saved after one sent a message to her boyfriend in England, and for a climber who was rescued with the help of a text from a mountain rescue team.

“Text language” emerged quickly because of the 160-character constraint of the keypad – and because to begin with it was time-consuming to enter words on a numerical keypad. Abbreviations such as “l8r”, “gr8” and “b4” soon had befuddled adults complaining that kids had lost the ability to spell correctly.

By 2003 exam markers had grown concerned about text language being used in answers; a 13-year-old girl wrote an essay in text shorthand, which said in part: “My smmr hols wr CWOT. B4, we used 2go2 NY 2C my bro, his GF & thr 3 :- kids FTF. ILNY, it’s a gr8 plc.” (Or in longhand: “My summer holidays were a complete waste of time. Before, we used to go to New York to see my brother, his girlfriend and their three (!) kids face to face. I love New York, it’s a great place.”)

Now, though, it’s texting rather than the English language that is under threat. The rise of smartphones and data services means the price of sending data has collapsed, and that has led to free services that can send data even when you can’t get a phone signal to send a text.

In January the Finnish mobile network Sonera reported that the number of texts sent on Christmas Eve 2011 was 8.5m, down from 10.9m the previous year. In Hong Kong, Christmas messaging dropped by 14%.

But that doesn’t mean messaging will go away, or that mobile operators are suddenly going to go bust. Texting has brought in more than $500bn and is still forecast to coin them $1tn over the next seven years as people use it for mobile banking in Africa and India, for charitable giving and for political donations.

Evans said operators would adjust their pricing models even as texting declined. “They’re going to start charging more money for more data. Transmitting 500 megabytes of data costs them more than transmitting 500 minutes of voice. So they’ll readjust their prices.”

But equally, he said, the idea of the short message between devices was here to stay. “Twitter was imagined as a text message service, that’s why each tweet has to be so short. The mechanism by which it’s delivered will change, but people will still find it convenient to send short messages to each other.”

Timeline

1992 First text message sent

1995 T9 system invented, making texting quicker

2001 Text volume passes 1bn a month in the UK

2001 Text messaging is used to help organise protests that topple President Joseph Estrada in the Philippines

2002 A service called Text2TV from a Devon-based company says it will let you send texts to your TV and reply via your remote. It doesn’t take off

2003 David Beckham sends a series of steamy text messages to his personal assistant Rebecca Loos; they are later published, and nearly end his marriage

2004 Tony Blair takes part in a live text chat

2005 The Eurovision song contest includes SMS votes, creating the biggest ever “televoting”

2008 Nielsen reports that the average US mobile user sends and receives more texts per month than phone calls – 357 v 204

2009 WhatsApp, a free text-like service that lets people send messages for free over data connections, is founded

2011 Number of texts sent at Christmas falls year-on-year in Finland, Hong Kong, Spain and the Netherlands

2012 Ofcom reports that text messages are the most-used method for daily communication with family and friends – 58% of UK adults do so at least once a day

2012 Rebekah Brooks reveals that David Cameron sent her texts signed “LOL” because he thought it meant “lots of love”; its usual meaning is “laughing out loud”

This article originally appeared on guardian.co.uk

Check First! Your favorite app can be a virus!

Angry Birds

Angry Birds (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Apps

Apps (Photo credit: TerryBrock)

Apps drive mobile devices. There’s one for just about everything, including one to detect a bomb! But there’s a risk with apps: it has to access personal data in the device.

All apps ask for permission while downloading. The requests include access to data network, call records, GPS coordinates, rights to modify contents of SD card, etc. These look harmless, and we grant them permission. But problems emerge when the apps have Trojans (a form of virus) hiding in them.

Earlier this year, security firm Sophos detected a Trojanized version of the Angry Birds game. “Trojans can come disguised as wallpaper applications . They contain the malicious package within it and may be hard to uninstall,” says Ruchna Nigam, security researcher, Fortiguard Labs. Zitmo , she says, is a well-known banking Trojan (it has SymbianAndroid and Blackberry versions) that can receive commands from the attacker to intercept SMS second-factor authentication banking tokens and forward them to the attacker, thereby exposing users to banking fraud.

 
Some applications, especially malicious ones, seek rights for activities unrelated to their function. When a music app seeks access to call records, you must wonder why, and check the credentials of the developer. It might be a safe app, but it is worth checking.

Juniper Networks‘ Mobile Threat Center analysed over 1.7 million apps on Google Play from March 2011 to September 2012.

English: Logo of Juniper Networks

English: Logo of Juniper Networks (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

It found that in the cards and casino games category, 94% of free apps that could make outbound calls didn’t describe why they would use this capability. Similarly, 85% of free apps that could send SMS didn’t specify why they should do so, says Ravi Chauhan, managing director India and Saarc, Juniper Networks.

In the racing games section, 99% of paid apps and 92% of free apps had rights to send SMS, while 50% could use camera and 95% could initiate outgoing calls — without any explanation as to why they needed to do that.

The survey found that free apps were 401% more likely to track location and 314% more likely to access contacts than their paid counterparts.

This gives an impression that free apps access info to target ads. But out of the 6,83,238 apps examined, the share of those with the top five advertising networks was much less than the total number tracking location (24%).

 

Read full story at http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/personal-tech/computing/Beware-your-favourite-app-can-be-a-virus/articleshow/17403343.cms